Cases 41 - 50 of 88
Glenn Hill v. Robert Tanner
as 12-31042
Petitioner - Appellant:
GLENN M. HILL
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT TANNER, Warden, Rayburn Correctional Center
Hill v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01062
Plaintiff:
Eddie M. Hill
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Depuy Inc , Depuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Third_party_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Piccolo v. Alaimo et al
as 2:2012cv00509
Plaintiff:
Marie M. Piccolo
Defendant:
Gerard N. Alaimo, Pamela A. Alaimo, Thomas M. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill v. Tanner et al
as 2:2012cv00369
Plaintiff:
Glenn M Hill
Defendant:
Robert Tanner
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Joseph Hill v. FCC, et al
as 12-60070
Petitioner:
JOSEPH M. HILL, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Lakehills Consulting, L.P.
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv03881
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv03879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv03880
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv02290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
