Cases 1 - 10 of 17
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Clark et al
as 3:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Defendant:
Alvin "Ted" Clark, J. W. C., C. R. B. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01434
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Conner v. Doe et al
as 1:2021cv00366
Defendant:
James E. Parks, Nikita B. Murphy, K. Breeding and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald T. Conner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Scott v. M&M Renovations, LLC
as 1:2019cv00036
Plaintiff:
Kelly Scott
Defendant:
M&M Renovations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LAUREL GARDENS, LLC et al v. MCKENNA et al
as 2:2018cv00210
Plaintiff:
Laurel Gardens, LLC , AMERICAN WINTER SERVICES, LLC , LAUREL GARDEN HOLDINGS, LLC and others
Defendant:
TIMOTHY MCKENNA, Michael McKenna, MAT SITE MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Richardson v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 4:2016cv00150
Plaintiff:
Patricia Richardson
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and M&M Asphalt Maintenance, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zuberi et al v. Hirezi et al
as 1:2016cv01077
Defendant:
Hirezi, Diana Hirezi, Advance Structural Concepts, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Zuberi and Ashley Zuberi
Counter Defendant:
Jacob Zuberi
Counter Claimant:
Manuel Hirezi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
