Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Zillow, Inc. v. Thomas Miller, et al
as 23-5301
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ZILLOW, INC.
Intervenor:
KENTUCKY PRESS ASSOCIATION, INC. and AMERICAN CITY BUSINESS JOURNALS, INC., dba Louisville Business First
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL P. BORK, Commissioner of the Kentucky Department of Revenue, BRAD MCDOWELL, Property Valuation Administrator for Shelby County, KY, KELLIE LANG, Property Valuation Administrator for Franklin County, KY and others
Zillow, Inc. v. Thomas Miller, et al
as 23-5300
Intervenor:
AMERICAN CITY BUSINESS JOURNALS, INC., dba Louisville Business First and KENTUCKY PRESS ASSOCIATION, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ZILLOW, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL P. BORK, Commissioner of the Kentucky Department of Revenue, BRAD MCDOWELL, Property Valuation Administrator for Shelby County, KY, KELLIE LANG, Property Valuation Administrator for Franklin County, KY and others
Zillow, Inc. v. Bork et al
as 3:2019cv00049
Defendant:
Blake Robertson, Jason Neely, Jill M. Mahoney and others
Plaintiff:
Zillow, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201
Stanley Gibbs v. Tim Ball, et al
as 09-1524
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANLEY GIBBS
Defendant - Appellee:
TIM BALL, THOMAS BIRKETT, PATRICIA CARUSO, Warden and others
Darrell Davis v. MDOC, et al
as 08-1196
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GRIFFUS, Corrections Officer, PATRICIA CARUSO, Director, MDOC and others
Gibbs et al v. Ball et al
as 2:2007cv15462
Plaintiff:
Stanley Gibbs and William Walker
Defendant:
Tim Ball, Thomas Birkett, Patricia Caruso and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv15265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Davis v. MDOC et al
as 2:2007cv14791
Plaintiff:
Darrell Davis
Defendant:
MDOC, Griffus, Patricia Caruso and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
