Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Michael Gates v. M. Buechter, et al
as 20-55473
Defendant:
C. WOFFORD, C. HUGHES, LONNIE D. JACKSON, Jr. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
M. BUECHTER, Facility Captain, individual capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL GATES
Henry C. Hayes v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2019cv09885
Defendant:
R. Clemons, Alan W. Cox, D. Ulstad and others
Plaintiff:
Henry C. Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry C. Hayes v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2019cv09513
Defendant:
R. Clemons, Alan W. Cox, D. Ulstad and others
Plaintiff:
Henry C. Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory Franklin v. R. Franklin et al
as 2:2019cv06255
Defendant:
Correctional Officer D. Moore, E. Delgadillo, Lieutenant A. H. Martinez and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2019cv04107
Defendant:
R. Clemons, Alan W. Cox, D. Ulstad and others
Plaintiff:
Henry C Hayes and Henry C. Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darnell Black, Sr. v. L. Williams, et al
as 19-55505
Defendant / Appellee:
D. BARBATO, M. STRATMAN, A. Warden, M. VOONG, Cheif and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARNELL BLACK, Sr.
Darnell Black Sr. v. L. Williams et al
as 2:2019cv02581
Defendant:
L. Williams, D. Ulstad, D Barbato and others
Plaintiff:
Darnell Black Sr. and Darnell Black, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond Alford Bradford v. Darnell Mebane et al
as 2:2019cv01202
Plaintiff:
Raymond Alford Bradford
Defendant:
J Medina, M Farham, K Graves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ciron B. Springfield v. Elwart et al
as 2:2017cv09123
Defendant:
T. Case, T. Case, R. Clemons and others
Plaintiff:
Ciron B Springfield
Joseph A Johnson v. Kathleen Dickinson et al
as 2:2014cv03390
Defendant:
B. Adams, Robert A Barton, K. Beltran and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph A Johnson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
