Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Archie WhalenIn re: Archie Whalen
as 24-5323
Petitioner:
In re: ARCHIE M. WHALEN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Archie Whalen
as 23-6126
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ARCHIE M. WHALEN
Archie WhalenIn re: Archie Whalen
as 23-6111
Petitioner:
In re: ARCHIE M. WHALEN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Whalen v. USA
as 4:2023cv00135
Petitioner:
Archie M. Whalen
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
McCarthy, et al. v. Intercontinental Exchange, Inc., et al.
as 23-3458
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LISA MCCARTHY, MARY KATHERINE ARCELL, KEITH DEAN BRADT and others
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE, INC., INTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE HOLDINGS, INC., ICE BENCHMARK ADMINISTRATION LIMITED and others
Defendant:
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, RBC CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC and THE NORINCHUKIN BANK
Archie WhalenIn re: Archie Whalen
as 23-5640
Petitioner:
In re: ARCHIE M. WHALEN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rosemary D'Augusta, et al v. American Petroleum Institute, et al
as 23-15878
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSEMARY D'AUGUSTA, BRENDA DAVIS, PAMELA FAUST and others
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, CHEVRONTEXACO CAPITAL CORPORATION and others
Archie WhalenIn re: Archie Whalen
as 22-5571
Petitioner:
In re: ARCHIE M. WHALEN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rosemary D'Augusta, et al v. USDC-CAOAK
as 22-70119
Not Classified By Court:
In re: ROSEMARY D'AUGUSTA, BRENDA DAVIS, PAMELA FAUST and others
Petitioner:
ROSEMARY D'AUGUSTA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Arcell et al v. Google LLC et al
as 5:2022cv02499
Plaintiff:
Mary Katherine Arcell, Keith Dean Bradt, Jose Brito and others
Defendant:
Google LLC, Alphabet, Inc., XXVI Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
