Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Thunderhorse v. Collier et al
as 4:2019cv01315
Defendant:
Dir of TDCJ-Parole Bryan Collier, Dr Lannette Linthicum, TDCJ, Director Lorie Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Iron Thunderhorse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thunderhorse v. Tilley, et al
as 6:2019cv00246
Defendant:
Cynthia D. Tilley, Sonja M. Boyd and Arnulfo Bennett
Plaintiff:
Iron Thunderhorse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thunderhorse v. Collier et al
as 9:2017cv00196
Plaintiff:
Iron Thunderhorse
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Lorie Davis, Lannette Linthicum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clarence Boyd v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 10-11278
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLARENCE M. BOYD
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Michael Perry v. Rick Thaler, Director, et al
as 09-50884
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL DEAN PERRY
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, MARY KAY SHELLEY, STEVE SPERRY and others
Perry v. Quarterman et al
as 6:2009cv00040
Plaintiff:
Michael Dean Perry
Defendant:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman, Mary Kay Shelley, Steve Sperry and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Madison v. Mays, et al
as 08-11199
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY HUGHES
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD MAYS, CHUCK MILLER, PHIL BARKER and others
Madison v. Mays, et al
as 08-11044
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY HUGHES
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD MAYS, CHUCK MILLER, PHIL BARKER and others
Boyd v. Quarterman
as 5:2008cv00124
Petitioner:
Clarence M Boyd
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Madison et al v. Mays et al
as 3:2007cv00969
Plaintiff:
Millie Madison, Jeremy Williams, Michael Anthony Hughes and others
Defendant:
Richard Mays, Chuck Miller, Phil Barker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
