Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Edwards v. California Supreme Court
as 24-2381
Plaintiff:
MYEISHA M. EDWARDS
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT
Myeisha Edwards v. California Supreme Court
as 23-16197
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MYEISHA M. EDWARDS
Defendant / Appellee:
CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT
Edwards v. California Supreme Court
as 3:2023cv02253
Plaintiff:
Myeisha M. Edwards
Defendant:
California Supreme Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Robertson's Ready Mix, Ltd. et al v. Gregory M. Edwards et al
as 5:2022cv01386
Plaintiff:
Robertson's Ready Mix, Ltd., RRM Properties, Ltd., Robertson's Transport, Ltd. and others
Defendant:
Gregory M. Edwards, Robert E. Matje, Mervyn Y. Encarnacion and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Meadows v. Winstead, et al.
as 2:2021cv00336
Plaintiff:
Dupree L. Meadows and Police Officer E. Breakie
Defendant:
Detective Alan Winstead, E. Edwards, A. Dowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Bruce v. Guerra, et al.
as 1:2020cv01625
Defendant:
J. Guerra, M. Edwards, J. Evans and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Wayne Bruce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. San Quentin State Prison et al
as 5:2020cv07567
Plaintiff:
Jahmal M. Edwards
Defendant:
Warden Ron Bloomfield, John Doe, San Quentin State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Ray v. Hosey, et al.
as 1:2020cv01076
Defendant:
B. Cates, California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, State of California and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Vincent Ray, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Stedvieno D. Mayes v. Edwards et al
as 1:2019cv01552
Defendant:
J. McDougle, E. Vargas, E. Valenzuela and others
Plaintiff:
Stedvieno D'Barge Mayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Stedvieno D. Mayes v. Edwards et al
as 2:2019cv02236
Defendant:
J. McDougle, E. Vargas, E. Valenzuela and others
Plaintiff:
Stedvieno D'Barge Mayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
