Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Gonzalez et al v. Rincon Argentino Incorporado et al
as 3:2022cv01385
Plaintiff:
Aurora M Gonzalez, Luis Gonzalez, Conjugal Partnership, Gonzalez and others
Defendant:
Rincon Argentino Incorporado, Triple-S Propiedad, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ESTATE OF CARMEN E. CRESPO et al v. DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF KOREA
as 1:2022cv01514
Plaintiff:
CARMEN E. CRESPO, MARCIANO CRESPO-GONZALEZ, CARMEN M. MARTINEZ-CAMACHO and others
Defendant:
DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF KOREA and NORTH KOREA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Rocio et al v. Intercontinental Terminals Company LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00836
Plaintiff:
VANESSA L. PEREZ, SCHARON NICHOLS, ERICA M. DAVIS and others
Defendant:
Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc., NSK, LTD., NSK PRECISION AMERICA, INC. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Cheryl A Marshall, Valerie M Morris and Connie M Laredo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GONZALEZ v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2019cv01937
Plaintiff:
SYLVIA M GONZALEZ and SYLVIA M. GONZALEZ
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
SCHOOLEY et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2017cv01376
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM M SCHOOLEY , JIMMY N ADAMS, CAROL S ADAMS and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY and IRANIAN ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS AKA THE PASDARAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602
Gina Gonzalez v. USA
as 13-15218
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GINA M. GONZALEZ, personally and as next best friend of A.F., a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Gonzalez v. United States of America
as 4:2012cv00375
Plaintiff:
Gina M Gonzalez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Gonzalez v. Walgreen Co.
as 1:2010cv22727
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Plaintiff:
Rosa M Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
