Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Montes v. Tibbs
as 24-20135
Plaintiff:
Daniel Montes, Jr.
Defendant:
Bertha A. Tibbs, Ben L. Tibbs, Jose M. Hernandez and others
Hernandez et al v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv00307
Plaintiff:
Andres A. Hernandez and Elda M. Hernandez
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Hernandez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv01762
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth M. Hernandez and Elizabeth M Hernandez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2022cv04382
Plaintiff:
Maria M. Hernandez
Defendant:
Carrington Foreclosure Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191 Bank Foreclosure
Hernandez v. Carrington Foreclosure Services, LLC
as 1:2022cv00168
Counter Defendant:
Maria M. Hernandez
Counter Claimant:
Carrington Foreclosure Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191 Bank Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Goodman v. Boeckmann et al
as 3:2021cv00353
Defendant:
Matthew McSorley, Alan M Bennett, Matthew K Rose and others
Plaintiff:
Joan Goodman
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00016
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Austin Reeves v. D. Carson, et al
as 20-11007
Defendant / Appellee:
Nicholas Campbell, City of Garland, M. Hernandez, Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Austin Reeves
Lee v. Hernandez et al
as 3:2020cv01558
Defendant:
Matthew J McSorley, Alan M Bennett, D Michael Steuert and others
Plaintiff:
Jay Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
