Cases 1 - 10 of 12
JOHNSON v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
as 1:2023cv00347
Petitioner:
CHARLES M. JOHNSON
Respondent:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2016cv00072
Plaintiff:
DAVID M. JOHNSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BETH F. COBERT, VICTORIA A. LIPNIC and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2016cv00057
Plaintiff:
DAVID M. JOHNSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL, THOMAS E. PEREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER v. GIPE et al
as 1:2014cv01483
Plaintiff:
GILBERT BAKER, JR.
Defendant:
BRUCE P. GIPE, R. S. BURKE, K. PFANZELTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AUTOR et al v. BLANK et al
as 1:2011cv01593
Plaintiff:
ERIK O. AUTOR , NATHANAEL E. HERMAN , CASS M. JOHNSON and others
Defendant:
REBECCA BLANK, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, RON KIRK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BELL v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA et al
as 1:2010cv00014
Plaintiff:
MARK BELL
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, TIM KANE, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION OF VIRGINIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BAILEY v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2009cv01254
Petitioner:
ARI BAILEY
Respondent:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, CONNELLY, DELBERT G. SAVERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JOHNSON v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2008cv00850
Petitioner:
ARISTEDE M. JOHNSON
Respondent:
MICHAEL MUKASEY and HARLEY G. LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
