Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Jones et al v. King et al
as 4:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones, Ysidro Renteria and William L. Jones Carr
Defendant:
Amber M. King, Chris H. Busse and Brandon W. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
smith v. Watkins et al
as 4:2014cv00710
Plaintiff:
james joseph smith
Defendant:
Randy Watkins, J. Thomson , S. Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Foster et al v. Global Acceptance Credit Company, L.P. et al
as 4:2012cv00421
Plaintiff:
Chippretta M Foster , Hattie M King-Williams , Sharon F Davis and others
Defendant:
Global Acceptance Credit Company, L.P. and Jefferson Capital Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Foster et al v. Global Acceptance Credit Company, L.P. et al
as 3:2012cv01858
Plaintiff:
Chippretta M Foster , Hattie M King-Williams , Sharon F Davis and others
Defendant:
Global Acceptance Credit Company, L.P. and Jefferson Capital Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
King v. Thaler
as 4:2011cv00928
Petitioner:
Billy M King
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodriguez v. Williams et al
as 4:2009mc00577
Plaintiff:
Felipe Pena Rodriguez
Defendant:
Betty J Williams, John Q Wang, Monica D Pickthall and others
Rodriguez v. Williams et al
as 4:2009mc00520
Plaintiff:
Felipe Pena Rodriguez
Defendant:
Betty J Williams, John Q Wang, Monica D Pickthall and others
Rodriguez v. Williams et al
as 4:2009mc00492
Plaintiff:
Felipe Pena Rodriguez
Defendant:
Betty J Williams, John Q Wang, Monica D Pickthall and others
Rodriguez v. Williams et al
as 4:2009mc00475
Plaintiff:
Felipe Pena Rodriguez
Defendant:
Betty J Williams, John Q Wang, Monica D Pickthall and others
King v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 4:2007cv03594
Plaintiff:
Fay M. King
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
