Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Armstrong et al v. Sheriff of Ellis County et al
as 3:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Christopher Armstrong, Richard Johnson, Lazaro Contreras and others
Defendant:
Sheriff of Ellis County, Ellis County Sheriff Office, Ellis County District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins, et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC, et al
as 2:2018cv04271
Plaintiff:
Ellenmarie K Perkins and Raymond M Perkins
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perkins et al v. GEICO Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv00331
Plaintiff:
Keri C. Perkins and Barry M. Perkins, Sr.
Defendant:
GEICO Corporation , Doe Defendant One and Doe Defendants 2-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perkins v. Walmart Stores, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00335
Plaintiff:
Barry M. Perkins
Defendant:
Walmart Stores, Inc. , Doe Defendant 1, Doe Defendant 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perkins et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc et al
as 6:2012cv02904
Plaintiff:
William D Perkins and Jane M Perkins
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gilbert et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc et al
as 6:2012cv02887
Plaintiff:
Harold Dean Gilbert , Doris Gilbert , Michael Jabour and others
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Perkins et al v. OneWest Bank, FSB
as 1:2012cv00671
Counter Plaintiff:
OneWest Bank, FSB
Defendant:
OneWest Bank, FSB
Counter Defendant:
Alise M. Perkins and Mark C. Perkins
Plaintiff:
Alise M. Perkins and Mark C. Perkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
