Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv02460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Sherman v. Yonkers Public Schools et al
as 1:2021cv07317
Defendant:
Cesar E. Chaves Elementary School, Yonkers Public Schools, Yonkers Public Schools Board of Education and others
Plaintiff:
Sherman Gwendolyn and Gwendolyn Sherman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2021cv04620
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sarah M. Quezada v. Andrew Saul
as 8:2021cv00318
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Sarah M Quezada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Phillip Killgore v. City of South El Monte, et al
as 20-55666
Defendant / Appellee:
T. HARRIS, N. TARIO, C. PRESTON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILLIP KILLGORE, DBA Lavender Massage
Magnum Property Investments, LLC v. Jose M. Quezada et al
as 2:2020cv00084
Plaintiff:
Magnum Property Investments, LLC
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Daisy Quezada, Jose M. Quezada and others
Liping Zhu v. City of South El Monte et al
as 2:2019cv05462
Defendant:
O. Garcia, J. Martinez, B. Comparan and others
Plaintiff:
Liping Zhu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
F.H. et al v. City of Yonkers et al
as 7:2019cv04722
Plaintiff:
HERNANDEZ FREDDY, EVELYN PICHARDO, Individually, F.H. an infant by his Mother and Natural Guardian EVELYN PICHARDO and others
Defendant:
EDWIN M. QUEZADA, PhD, JOHN DOE "1-5", Yonkers Public Schools and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
