Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Sarah M. Quezada v. Andrew Saul
as 8:2021cv00318
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Sarah M Quezada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Phillip Killgore v. City of South El Monte, et al
as 20-55666
Defendant / Appellee:
T. HARRIS, N. TARIO, C. PRESTON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILLIP KILLGORE, DBA Lavender Massage
Magnum Property Investments, LLC v. Jose M. Quezada et al
as 2:2020cv00084
Plaintiff:
Magnum Property Investments, LLC
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Daisy Quezada, Jose M. Quezada and others
Liping Zhu v. City of South El Monte et al
as 2:2019cv05462
Defendant:
O. Garcia, J. Martinez, B. Comparan and others
Plaintiff:
Liping Zhu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillip Killgore v. City of South El Monte et al
as 2:2019cv00442
Defendant:
O. Garcia, K. Rivas, B. Comparan and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Killgore dba Lavender Massage, Phillip Killgore and Phillip Killgore doing business as Lavender Massage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Puckett v. Galindo et al
as 2:2018cv01918
Defendant:
E. Reyes, T Eilers, T.W. Steadman and others
Plaintiff:
Durrell Anthony Puckett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Puckett v. Galindo et al
as 1:2018cv00955
Defendant:
E. Reyes, T Eilers, T.W. Steadman and others
Plaintiff:
Durrell Anthony Puckett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Geraldine Pierce et al v. Donald J. Trump et al
as 2:2017cv07267
Plaintiff:
A.C.L.U., A.C.L.U., Anti-Racist Action and others
Conjoined:
American Society Journalist, Bayview-Newspaper, Congress Watch and others
Defendant:
Carlos T. Bea, Sgt. K. Bell, Nancy Bell and others
UNder Lock And Key:
M.I.M.
Carlos M. Quezada v. K. Harrington
as 2:2010cv05103
Respondent:
K. Harrington
Petitioner:
Carlos M. Quezada
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
