Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Rivera v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv02281
Plaintiff:
Sandra M. Rivera
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
Soutemenides v. Rivera et al
as 1:2023cv00381
Plaintiff:
Petros Soutemenides
Defendant:
M. Rivera, R. Ewing, Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00787
Plaintiff:
Tina M. Rivera
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rivera Boschetti v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2021cv06226
Plaintiff:
Yaritza M Rivera Boschetti
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rivera v. Tavarez
as 1:2021cv01003
Plaintiff:
Sobeida M Rivera
Defendant:
Toyota Lease Trust and Arleni Delgado Tavarez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr
Rivera v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv03859
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Tina M. Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Fiorino v. Maldonado et al
as 6:2019cv06475
Defendant:
Comstar Enterprises, Inc., Maria Rivera Maldonado and Maria M. Rivera Maldonado
Plaintiff:
Joseph Fiorino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson v. Bolt et al
as 9:2018cv00416
Defendant:
M. Rivera, K. Hayes and J. Bolt
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Roy Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Purisima v. City of New York ("City") et al
as 1:2016cv09786
Plaintiff:
Anton Purisima
Defendant:
City of New York ("City"), Human Resources Administration (HRA), T. Edema and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rivera v. Sticht
as 6:2016cv06626
Petitioner:
Joseph M. Rivera
Respondent:
Thomas J. Sticht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
