Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Cantrell v. Evans
as 2:2007cv01440
Petitioner:
Steven Kraig Cantrell
Respondent:
M. S. Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tony Blackman v. Van Sicklen et al
as 1:2007cv00946
Plaintiff:
Tony Blackman
Defendant:
Steven R. Van Sicklen, John A. Clarke, Joseph M. Pulido and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fosselman v. Evans
as 1:2007cv00812
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Fosselman
Respondent:
M. S. Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGruder v. Evans
as 2:2007cv01033
Petitioner:
Terrance V McGruder
Respondent:
M. S. Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brian Douglas Martin v. M.S. Evans
as 1:2007cv00765
Petitioner:
Brian Douglas Martin
Respondent:
M. S. Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rojas v. Evans
as 2:2007cv00911
Petitioner:
Jose Carlos Rojas
Respondent:
M. S. Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Youngblood v. Evans et al
as 2:2007cv00691
Petitioner:
Jesse L Youngblood
Respondent:
M. S. Evans, Salinas Valley State Prison and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cuadras v. Evans
as 2:2007cv00222
Petitioner:
Federico Cuadras, Jr.
Respondent:
M. S. Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Derwin Jules Jackson v. W. Sullivan, Et Al.
as 1:2007cv00178
Plaintiff:
Derwin Jules Jackson
Defendant:
W Sullivan, T. W. Meadors, J L Cobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carpenter v. Sullivan, et al.
as 1:2007cv00114
Plaintiff:
Willie Lee Carpenter
Defendant:
W. J. Sullivan, M. S. Evans, M. Carrasco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
