Cases 21 - 30 of 145
Curry v. California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2009cv03408
Plaintiff:
Terrell D. Curry
Defendant:
California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, Salinas Valley State Prison, Matthew Cate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Evans
as 1:2009cv01278
Petitioner:
Hekima T. Perry
Respondent:
M. S. Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Timothy J. Severson v. M. S. Evans
as 2:2009cv05011
Petitioner:
Timothy J. Severson
Respondent:
M. S. Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Watkins v. Evans
as 3:2009cv03071
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Watkins
Respondent:
M. S. Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Domonick Guy v. M. S. Evans
as 2:2009cv04889
Petitioner:
Domonick Guy
Respondent:
M. S. Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Joe A. Houghton v. M.S. Evans
as 2:2009cv04720
Petitioner:
Joe A. Houghton
Respondent:
M. S. Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Jordan v. Evans
as 5:2009cv02715
Petitioner:
Charles Jordan
Respondent:
M. S. Evans and Anthony Hedgpeth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jordan v. Evans
as 3:2009cv02715
Petitioner:
Charles Jordan
Respondent:
M. S. Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Albers v. Evans
as 3:2009cv02647
Petitioner:
Alfred D. Albers
Respondent:
M. S. Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Glen W. Robison v. M.S. Evans
as 5:2009cv01059
Petitioner:
Glen W Robison
Respondent:
M S Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
