Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Crawford #560561 v. Detroit, City of, et al
as 2:2020cv00256
Defendant:
G. Jack, Darryl Cross, George Wood and others
Plaintiff:
Seanderyl Crawford #560561
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Washington et al
as 2:2019cv10633
Defendant:
Mr. Kinner, Grant, Ms. V. Hinorosa and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Mitchell
Caver #200563 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv00171
Plaintiff:
Larry Terrill Caver #200563
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Access Securpak Company, Narcotics Analysis Reagent Mark II Kit Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon #210062 v. Morrison et al
as 1:2013cv01078
Plaintiff:
Marcael Mario Dixon #210062
Defendant:
B. Morrison, Unknown Lockwood, Unknown Stepp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2013cv00284
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Baker #182416
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Prison Health Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv10230
Plaintiff:
Robert Baker
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Correctional Medical Services, Incorporated, Prison Health Services, Incorporated and others
Collins v. Cichowski et al
as 2:2012cv14560
Plaintiff:
Mario Collins
Defendant:
Cichowski, Zamora, M Szappan and others
Mourice Neal v. M. Szappan, et al
as 11-1024
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOURICE NEAL
Defendant - Appellee:
M. SZAPPAN, D. BELTZ, M. KOHLOFF and others
Charlie Floyd v. Deborah Haire, et al
as 10-2404
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLIE FLOYD
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBORAH HAIRE, in her official capacity and M. SZAPPAN
Neal v. Szappan et al
as 2:2010cv14168
Plaintiff:
Mourice Neal
Defendant:
M. Szappan, D Beltz, M Kohloff and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
