Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Rios v. Miller et al
as 5:2023cv00306
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
D. Miller, M. Taylor, C. Tovar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Kilpatrick et al
as 1:2023cv00081
Defendant:
FNU Erizona, Sean C Kilpatrick, Sgt. E and others
Plaintiff:
Devin Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor et al v. ASI Lloyds et al
as 4:2022cv04273
Plaintiff:
Michael B Taylor and Shannon M Taylor
Defendant:
ASI Lloyds and Brian Maxey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Taylor v. Taylor et al
as 6:2022cv01203
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Taylor
Defendant:
Vladimir Taylor, Brittany Hartley and Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Taylor et al
as 4:2022cv02827
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Taylor
Defendant:
Vladimir Taylor, Sgt Brittany Hartley and Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkins v. Duncanville Independent School District et al
as 3:2022cv01015
Plaintiff:
Brittany Wilkins
Defendant:
Duncanville Independent School District, Duncanville Independent School District Board of Trustees, Duncanville Independent School District Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nolley v Taylor
as 1:2021cv00205
Plaintiff:
Erron K Nolley
Defendant:
M Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jaramillo v. Werner Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 6:2019cv00001
Plaintiff:
Javier Jaramillo
Defendant:
Raymond Rodriguez, Werner Enterprises, Inc. and Vernice M Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jaramillo v. Werner Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00106
Plaintiff:
Javier Jaramillo
Defendant:
Raymond Rodriguez, Werner Enterprises, Inc. and Vernice M Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
