Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Williams v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Kimberly M. Williams
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv02039
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Jodi M. Williams
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv00125
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Shanna M. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Williams v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02988
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Teresa M. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dixon v. Williams et al
as 1:2019cv00176
Defendant:
Todd Portune, Commissioner, Cooley Turner, Chris Monzel and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00765
Plaintiff:
Ruth M Williams
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Godfrey v. Williams et al
as 1:2018cv00663
Defendant:
Judge John (NMN) Williams, Dwayne R. Bowman, Commissioner Chris Monzel and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Godfrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Hamilton County Juvenile Court et al
as 1:2018cv00462
Defendant:
Denise Driehaus, Judge Melissa Powers, Nya Cruse and others
Plaintiff:
Glenda A Smith, T A Jo and Tiffany Johnston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Graham et al v. Williams et al
as 1:2018cv00439
Plaintiff:
Christopher A Graham , Sharone Graham , Teaunte Alexander and others
Defendant:
John M Williams, Moira Weir, Genine Menefield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hoskins v. Peterson et al
as 1:2018cv00305
Plaintiff:
Azuriah Hoskins
Defendant:
Peterson , Turner , Lonzman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
