Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Williams v. USA
as 3:2016cv00289
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Timothy M. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry-Bey et al v. Holder et al
as 1:2014cv00215
Plaintiff:
Roy L. Perry-Bey and Ronald M. Green
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Angela J. Miller, T. Christian Herren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
PERRY-BEY et al v. CITY OF NORFOLK VIRGINIA et al
as 2:2013cv00250
Plaintiff:
Roy L. Perry-Bey and Ronald M. Green
Defendant:
Virginia City Of Norfolk, Paul D. Fraim, ANTHONY L. BURFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams et al v. Bettencourt
as 2:2013cv00131
Plaintiff:
Patricia A. Williams and David M. Williams
Defendant:
Pamela Bettencourt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Libel, Assault, Slander
Williams v. Commissioner Of Social Security
as 7:2012cv00242
Defendant:
Commissioner Of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Hope M. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Barbour v. Williams et al
as 7:2011cv00167
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Defendant:
Mrs. R. Kegley and M. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bragg v. Williams
as 1:2010cv00655
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Bragg
Defendant:
M. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barksdale et al v. E & M Transportation, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00140
Plaintiff:
Angela Barksdale, Consuela A. Hill, Pearl A. Neal and others
Defendant:
E & M Transportation, Inc., Eleasea B. Lawrence and Marlon L. Williams, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00533
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
