Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Williams v. Tik-Tok, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Wendy M. Williams
Defendant:
Tik-Tok, Inc., Zhang Yiming and TIK TOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Williams v. AT&T
as 1:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Wendy M. Williams
Defendant:
AT&T
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Williams v. Nexstar Media Group et al
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Wendy M. Williams
Defendant:
Nexstar Media Group, Perry A. Sooks, Geoff Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Nexstar Media Group et al
as 1:2023cv00456
Plaintiff:
Wendy M. Williams
Defendant:
Nexstar Media Group, Perry Sooks, Geoff Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01353
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Davis v. Madison County Alabama et al
as 5:2016cv01166
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Davis
Defendant:
Madison County Alabama, Blake Dorning, Steve Morrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. City of Birmingham et al
as 2:2015cv00949
Plaintiff:
Lameco M. Williams
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, Nathan Elmore, Jeffery Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Madison County, Alabama et al
as 5:2014cv01964
Plaintiff:
Tanyatta Woods
Defendant:
Madison County, Alabama , Blake Dorning , Steve Morrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jefferson v. Madison County, Alabama et al
as 5:2014cv01959
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Jefferson
Defendant:
Madison County, Alabama , Blake Dorning , Steve Morrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Radcliff v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2014cv01868
Plaintiff:
Arthur I. Radcliff
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Birmingham Board of Education, Craig Weatherspoon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
