Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Young v. Wilson et al
as 6:2023cv01201
Plaintiff:
Willie Young
Defendant:
Alan M Wilson, SC Dept of Corrections, Bryan Stirling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Grant v. PETER WOLF & ASSOCIATES PC et al
as 9:2022cv04262
Plaintiff:
Terry Lennette Grant
Defendant:
PETER WOLF & ASSOCIATES PC, Peter Wolf, Esq, WOLF & MOGIL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Pendarvis v. Wilson et al
as 2:2022cv03142
Plaintiff:
John Trenton Pendarvis
Defendant:
Alan M. Wilson, Mark A. Keel, Hugh E. Weathers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Goss v. Stirling et al
as 2:2022cv01619
Plaintiff:
Darrell L Goss
Defendant:
Bryan P. Stirling, Brian Kendell and M. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Newton et al
as 1:2022cv00429
Petitioner:
Mr. Nathaniel Johnson, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden McKendley Newton, Mr. Alan M. Wilson and South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rochester v. Wilson
as 6:2021cv03759
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
A M Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Williams et al
as 6:2021cv03413
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
C ` Williams, B Stirling, H D McMaster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Wilson
as 6:2021cv00544
Respondent:
Alan M Wilson and Broad River Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Michael A Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rochester v. Invacare Corporation et al
as 6:2020cv04261
Defendant:
B Stirling, Tamaulipas Reymosa, Alan M Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bagley v. James
as 5:2020cv03013
Petitioner:
Bernard Bagley
Respondent:
Bryan Stirling, Alan M Wilson and Tonya James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
