Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
COELLO v. DILEO et al
as 2:2020cv01682
Plaintiff:
YASMINE COELLO
Defendant:
KATHLEEN ESTABROOKS, NICHOLAS P. SCUTARI, JOHN DOE(S) 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
M.J. v. NATIONS RECOVERY CENTER, INC.
as 2:2019cv18260
Plaintiff:
M.J.
Defendant:
NATIONS RECOVERY CENTER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 22
STEVENS v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER et al
as 3:2016cv09090
Plaintiff:
CALVIN T. STEVENS
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER, KEVIN WALKER, ESQ. and SUSAN M.J. MARTIN, ESQ.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
DIEZ v. ERVELLI et al
as 2:2016cv08703
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN DIEZ
Defendant:
THOMAS J. ERVELLI , RICHARD ALAM , M.J. BUTLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HERNANDEZ v. RYAN et al
as 1:2015cv06718
Plaintiff:
ALAN R. HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
M.J. RYAN and TROOPERS JOHN DOE 1 - 5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv03788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
KIRKLAND et al v. DILEO et al
as 2:2012cv01196
Plaintiff:
WENDELL KIRKLAND and ANTHONY KIRKLAND
Defendant:
LOUIS M.J. DILEO and CITY OF LINDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COPELAND v. PRINCE et al
as 3:2011cv04993
Plaintiff:
M.J. COPELAND and Leslie Katz
Defendant:
CHARLES O. PRINCE, III, ANNE M. MULCAHY, MARY SUE COLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
M.J. COPELAND v. MULCAHY et al
as 3:2010cv06251
Plaintiff:
M.J. COPELAND
Defendant:
ANNE M. MULCAHY, CHARLES O. PRINCE, III, MARY SUE COLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
