Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00351
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lumumba v. Clarke et al
as 7:2022cv00396
Plaintiff:
Askari Danso M.S. Lumumba
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Joseph W. Walters, David Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lumumba et al v. Clarke et al
as 7:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
Askari Dansa M.S. Lumumba, John Beverly, Anthony Shaw and others
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, A. David Robinson, David Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Fields et al
as 7:2021cv00244
Defendant:
T. Lowe, Carl Manis, A.T. Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Karsten O. Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dougherty v Commonwealth of Virginia, et al.
as 1:2017cv00302
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Dougherty
Defendant:
Dana Lawhorne, Schuler, Sergeant Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sam Wang Produce, Inc. et al v. Kang's Farms, Inc. et al
as 1:2013mc00011
Plaintiff:
Sam Wang Produce, Inc., Four Seasons Produce, Inc., I Love Produce, LLC and others
Defendant:
Kang's Farms, Inc., M.S. 3000, Inc., Grand Mart, Inc. and others
Taylor v. Ollie et al
as 2:2009cv00320
Plaintiff:
William Henry Taylor, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer Ollie, Mr. Samuel and M.S. Pamela
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
M.S. et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2007cv01064
Plaintiff:
M.S., M.S., Pamela Sluka and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
SM Consulting, Inc. v. Brady
as 1:2007cv00353
Plaintiff:
SM Consulting, Inc. and SM Consulting, Inc.
Defendant:
James M.S. Brady and James M.S. Brady
Counter Claimant:
James M.S. Brady
Counter Defendant:
James M.S. Brady
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
