Cases 1 - 10 of 10
M.Y. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01821
Plaintiff:
M.Y.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Denial of Application for Naturalization Hearing
Garcia et al v. Yuba County Sheriff's Department, et al
as 2:2019cv02621
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Ruiz, L.Y., Carmel Garcia and others
Defendant:
City of Vacaville and Yuba County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS CONIGLIARO et al v. MARK YEH et al
as 2:2013cv02353
Plaintiff:
Thomas Conigliaro and Verify, LLC
Defendant:
M.Y. Partners, Ltd. and Mark Yeh
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02328
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011at01258
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Carceioly v. Khalaf et al
as 5:2011cv04200
Plaintiff:
Miguelangelo Carceioly
Defendant:
M.Y. Mike Khalaf, North Coast Couriers, Inc., Franklin Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Angel et al v. North Coast Couriers, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv01028
Plaintiff:
Rene Angel , Marco Flores and David Martinez
Defendant:
North Coast Couriers, Inc., SS Couriers, Inc., Mario Sorto and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Angel et al v. North Coast Couriers, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv01028
Plaintiff:
Rene Angel , Marco Flores and David Martinez
Defendant:
North Coast Couriers, Inc., SS Couriers, Inc., Mario Sorto and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
