Cases 1 - 10 of 547
Day et al v. Christiansen et al
as 1:2019cv00070
Plaintiff:
James Day and Jennifer Day
Defendant:
Kathy Christiansen and MacArthur & Company Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gray v. MacArthur Company
as 5:2016cv05095
Plaintiff:
Robert Gray
Defendant:
MacArthur Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1128
Debtor - Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03115
In_re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested_party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Phillips v. Crane Co. et al
as 3:2013cv05655
Defendant:
Crane Co. , Asbestos Corporation Limited, Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
David Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Schulz v. Crane Co., et al
as 2:2013cv02370
Defendant:
Crane Co. , General Electric Company, Honeywell International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Schulz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Ronald Harris v. Asbestos Corporation Limited et al
as 2:2013cv05743
Defendant:
A O Smith Corporation, A W Chesterton Company, Armstrong International Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Harris
Mellis v. Crane Co.
as 4:2013cv03449
Plaintiff:
Elwood Mellis
Defendant:
Asbestos Corporation Limited, Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc., A.W. Chesterton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Pacific Stock, Inc. v. MacArthur & Company Inc.
as 3:2013mc00883
Plaintiff:
Pacific Stock, Inc.
Defendant:
MacArthur & Company Inc.
Dorl et al v. Asbestos Corporation Limited et al
as 3:2013cv01641
Plaintiff:
Charles Dorl and Shirley Dorl
Defendant:
Asbestos Corporation Limited, Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc., Ingersoll-Rand Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
