Cases 1 - 8 of 8
LexMac Energy, L.P., et al v. Macquarie Bank Limited, et al
as 14-1683
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LexMac Energy, L.P., Lexar Energy, Inc. and Novus Operating Company, L.P.
Defendant - Appellant:
Macquarie Bank Limited and Macquarie Barnett, LLC
LexMac Energy, L.P., et al v. Macquarie Bank Limited, et al
as 14-1684
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LexMac Energy, L.P., Lexar Energy, Inc. and Novus Operating Company, L.P.
Defendant - Appellee:
Macquarie Bank Limited and Macquarie Barnett, LLC
Development Funding Associates, LLC v. Macquarie Bank Limited
as 2:2011cv03984
Plaintiff:
Development Funding Associates, LLC
Defendant:
Macquarie Bank Limited
Signal Hill Service, Inc et al. v. Macquarie Bank Limited
as 2:2011cv01539
Counter Defendant:
Carpinteria Offshore Project Partnership and Signal Hill Service, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carpinteria Offshore Project Partnership and Signal Hill Service, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Macquarie Bank Limited
Defendant:
Macquarie Bank Limited
Pisces Energy, L.L.C. et al v. MacQuarie Bank Limited
as 2:2009cv02854
Plaintiff:
Pisces Energy, L.L.C., Pisces Energy, L.L.C., Palm Energy Partners, L.L.C. and others
Defendant:
MacQuarie Bank Limited
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MacQuarie Group Limited et al v. Martenson
as 3:2009cv00093
Plaintiff:
MacQuarie Group Limited, MacQuarie Group Limited, MacQuarie Bank Limited and others
Defendant:
Peter Martenson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MacQuarie Group Limited et al v. Martenson
as 1:2008cv07833
Plaintiff:
MacQuarie Group Limited, MacQuarie Group Limited, MacQuarie Bank Limited and others
Defendant:
Peter Martenson
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Macquarie Bank Limited v. Bradley D. Knickel et al
as 4:2008cv00048
Plaintiff:
Macquarie Bank Limited, Macquarie Bank Limited and Macquarie Bank Limited
Defendant:
Bradley D. Knickel, Bradley D. Knickel, Bradley D. Knickel and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
