Cases 1 - 7 of 7
MOHAMED v. ADAMS
as 2:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
MAHMOUD D MOHAMED
Defendant:
SHAQUAE L ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Simha & Nataly Trading, Inc. et al v. Blues Company for Export and General Supplies et al
as 1:2020cv05700
Plaintiff:
Cherry Hill Gourmet MGT LLC and Simha & Nataly Trading, Inc.
Defendant:
Blues Company for Export and General Supplies, Mahmoud Ahmed Mohamed Abdelkerim and Cosco Shipping Lines Co., LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Simha & Nataly Trading, Inc. et al v. Blues Company for Export and General Supplies et al
as 1:2020cv09639
Plaintiff:
Cherry Hill Gourmet MGT LLC and Simha & Nataly Trading, Inc.
Defendant:
Blues Company for Export and General Supplies, Mahmoud Ahmed Mohamed Abdelkerim and Cosco Shipping Lines Co., LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv15778
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Bersoum v. Abotaeta
as 1:2016cv00987
Plaintiff:
Boshra Farid Youssef Bersoum , Waheed Mankorios , Michael Mankorios and others
Defendant:
Mustafa T.A Abotaeta, Al-Mahdi Hassan Muftah Allabad and Mohamed Al Mismari
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1350
AZIZ v. CARTAGENA et al
as 2:2013cv01158
Plaintiff:
AHMED ABD EL AZIZ
Defendant:
R. CARTAGENA, POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOES 1-10, THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mohamed v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF HEARTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE
as 1:2011cv01293
Plaintiff:
Mahmoud Aly Mohamed
Defendant:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF HEARTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE, a Body Politic and Corporate of the State of Illinois, John Astroth Ph.D., President of Heartland Community College, In His Individual and Official Capacities, Allen Goben, Successor President of Heartland Community College, in His Individual and Official Capacities and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
