Cases
Progressive Direct Insurance Company v. Bartels et al
as 5:2023cv01105
Plaintiff: Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Defendant: Amy Bartels, David Batton Law, Washington Regional Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Progressive Direct Insurance Company v. Bartels et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv01068
Plaintiff: Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Defendant: Amy Bartels, David Batton Law, Washington Regional Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
USA, et al v. Caremark, Inc, et al
as 5:2012cv00929
Neutral: Karl Bayer and Paul Stickney
Special Master: Karl Bayer
Intervenor Defendant: Caremark Inc. and Caremark RX, Inc.
Defendant: Caremark International Holdings, Inc., Caremark International, Inc., Caremark RX, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: District of Columbia, Janaki Ramados, State of Delaware and others
Movant: Health Care of Delaware, Inc., HealthAssurance of Pennsylvania, McKesson Corporation and others
Notice Only Party: KPMG LLP, Medco Health Solutions, Inc., Public Consulting Group, Inc. and others
919)571-4837 (fax: State of North Carolina
Intervenor Plaintiff: The State of California, United States Of America, the State of Arkansas and others
Unknown: Nicholas Bagley, Meredith Lynn Burrell and Jeanette L. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
CHILDREN'S SPECIALIZED HOSPITAL v. RIVER et al
as 2:2011cv03291
Plaintiff: CHILDREN'S SPECIALIZED HOSPITAL
Defendant: FRED RIVER and MAIL HANDLERS BENEFIT PLAN
Cross_claimant: MAIL HANDLERS BENEFIT PLAN
Cross_defendant: FRED RIVER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
IN-BALANCE HEALTH, LLC v. MAIL HANDLERS BENEFIT PLAN
as 2:2010cv05643
Plaintiff: IN-BALANCE HEALTH, LLC
Defendant: MAIL HANDLERS BENEFIT PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
RARITAN BAY MEDICAL CENTER - OLD BRIDGE (ROBERT HEYD) v. MAIL HANDLERS BENEFIT PLAN
as 3:2010cv05471
Plaintiff: RARITAN BAY MEDICAL CENTER - OLD BRIDGE (ROBERT HEYD)
Defendant: MAIL HANDLERS BENEFIT PLAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Type: Contract Insurance
Summit Plastic Surgery PC v. US Office of Personnel Management et al
as 1:2009cv00065
Plaintiff: Summit Plastic Surgery PC and Summit Plastic Surgery PC
Defendant: US Office of Personnel Management and Mail Handlers Benefits Plan
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Type: Contract None
Gundersen Clinic Ltd et al v. Stute
as 3:2007cv00568
Plaintiff: Gundersen Clinic Ltd and Gunderson Lutheran Medical Center
Defendant: William Stute
ThirdParty Plaintiff: William Stute
ThirdParty Defendant: Mail Handlers Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?