Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Samuel Maldonado v. Warden Fairton FCI
as 23-3077
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL MALDONADO
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN FAIRTON FCI
MALDONADO v. CRUZ
as 1:2023cv20546
Petitioner:
AMADO MALDONADO
Respondent:
ACTING WARDEN CRUZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MALDONADO v. WALKER et al
as 2:2023cv02850
Petitioner:
ANGEL MALDONADO
Respondent:
TINA WALKER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MALDONADO v. KNIGHT
as 1:2023cv02102
Petitioner:
AMADO MALDONADO
Respondent:
WARDEN KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Maldonado v. Rickard
as 1:2023cv00209
Petitioner:
Ralph Maldonado
Respondent:
Acting Warden Rickard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Crenshaw v. Maldonado et al
as 1:2022cv02009
Petitioner:
Anthony Crenshaw
Respondent:
Officer Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MALDONADO v. MERENDINO
as 1:2022cv04874
Petitioner:
SAMUEL MALDONADO
Defendant:
S. MERENDINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rocco Maldonado v. Attorney General New Jersey, et al
as 22-1593
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROCCO MALDONADO
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY and ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON
Maldonado v. Smith et al
as 1:2021cv00324
Respondent:
Barry Smith and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Petitioner:
Phillip Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cruz-Maldonado v. Warden of SCI-Houtzdale et al
as 1:2020cv01151
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Warden of SCI-Houtzdale
Petitioner:
Abraham (Junior) Cruz-Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
