Cases 1 - 10 of 16
MALDONADO v. WALKER et al
as 2:2023cv02850
Petitioner:
ANGEL MALDONADO
Respondent:
TINA WALKER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maldonado v. Rickard
as 1:2023cv00209
Petitioner:
Ralph Maldonado
Respondent:
Acting Warden Rickard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Crenshaw v. Maldonado et al
as 1:2022cv02009
Petitioner:
Anthony Crenshaw
Respondent:
Officer Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Maldonado v. Smith et al
as 1:2021cv00324
Respondent:
Barry Smith and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Petitioner:
Phillip Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cruz-Maldonado v. Warden of SCI-Houtzdale et al
as 1:2020cv01151
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Warden of SCI-Houtzdale
Petitioner:
Abraham (Junior) Cruz-Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MALDONADO v. WARDEN FCI MCKEAN
as 1:2019cv00328
Respondent:
WARDEN FCI MCKEAN
Petitioner:
RICHARD MALDONADO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MALDONADO v. WARDEN, SCI GRATERFORD et al
as 2:2017cv05710
Petitioner:
MARCO MALDONADO
Respondent:
WARDEN, SCI GRATERFORD and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MALDONADO v. FOLINO
as 2:2014cv01716
Petitioner:
ANGEL MALDONADO
Respondent:
LOUIS FOLINO and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MALDONADO v. WIGEN
as 3:2014cv00033
Petitioner:
SANTOS MALDONADO
Respondent:
G. C. WIGEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MALDONADO v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv07029
Petitioner:
DAVID MALDONADO
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and MICHAEL WENEROWICZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
