Cases 21 - 30 of 1,375
Carroll v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Andres Carroll
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Carol Chapdelaine, Edward Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Branch v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
Derrick Branch
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Maldonado and Chapdelane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weed v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00494
Plaintiff:
Chad Weed
Defendant:
Semple, James Dzurenda, Kevin Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Albarran-Gonzal et al v. Maldonado et al
as 3:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Joel Albarran-Gonzal and Jason Turoczi
Defendant:
Maldonado, Semple, Gary Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman et al v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Hanif Aminuddin, Dhati Coleman, Andre Reed and others
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Angel Quiros, Edward Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bridges v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
David Bridges
Defendant:
Semple, Arnone, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arpin v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Barry J Arpin
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Scot Semple, Rollin Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quirk v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00394
Plaintiff:
Devin John Quirk
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Maldonado and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khalid v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
Hasan Khalid
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Cepelak, Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Volcy v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Boyce Volcy
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Aknont, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
