Cases 41 - 50 of 84
Maldonado v. Shiro et al
as 1:2015cv03409
Plaintiff:
Angel Maldonado
Defendant:
Dora B. Shiro, Tony Durante and City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Wilson et al
as 1:2015cv02822
Plaintiff:
Christopher Neal
Defendant:
Wilson, Rodriguez, Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Skrine v. Schriro et al
as 1:2015cv00415
Plaintiff:
Skrine and Armand Skrine
Defendant:
Schriro, Dr. Dora B. Schriro, Lewis Finkelman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv04339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morales v. United States of America et al
as 1:2014cv00485
Dental Assistant:
D. Louis
Defendant:
MDC Legal Department, MDC Medical Department, Unit Manager Hector Maldonado and others
Plaintiff:
Lixander Morales
Dentist:
Dr. Patel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baez v. Pinker et al
as 1:2013cv09165
Plaintiff:
Candido Baez
Defendant:
Pinker, McNamara, Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Febres v. Maldonado et al
as 7:2013cv06257
Plaintiff:
Naquan Febres
Defendant:
Maldonado, Kuzma and City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maldonado v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv00820
Petitioner:
Angel Maldonado
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Alonzo v. Maldonado et al
as 2:2012cv04585
Defendant:
6th Precient, Suffolk County, Robert Doroski and Joseph Maldonado
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Alonzo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. Hon. James Doyle et al
as 2:2012cv04359
Defendant:
18-b Attorney Christopher Brocato, Arresting Officer ID SPD 34418, Joseph N. Brittelli and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
