Cases 31 - 40 of 1,379
Markeveys v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
Matthew Markeveys
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Maldonado, Gary Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Davis
Defendant:
Scott Semple, James Dzurenda, Edward Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clemons v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Acza Clemons
Defendant:
Scott Semple, James Pzurenda, Leo Arnone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khalid v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
Hasan Khalid
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Cepelak, Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Volcy v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Boyce Volcy
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Aknont, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rodriguez
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Edward Maldonado, Carol Chapdelaine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maldonado v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00085
Petitioner:
Symon Anthony Maldonado
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Wallace, William v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv14095
Plaintiff:
William J. Wallace
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections and Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Batiz v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
Heriberto Batiz
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Arnone, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Carvaughn Johnson
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Leo Arnone, James Dzurenda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
