Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Malhi v. Garland
as 23-17
Petitioner:
BALJIT SINGH MALHI
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
PHILADELPHIA TAXI ASSOCIATION, INC. et al v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
as 2:2016cv01207
Plaintiff:
PHILADELPHIA TAXI ASSOCIATION, INC. , AAMIR TRANS., INC. , AANYIA TRANS., INC. and others
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Wallis v. Levine et al.
as 1:2012cv06466
Defendant:
Childcraft Industries, Inc., Parent Units, RC2 and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Wallis
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
USA v. Rajinder Malhi
as 10-50596
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAJINDER SINGH MALHI
Balvir Singh-Malhi v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-73608
Petitioner:
BALVIR SINGH-MALHI
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Bonanno, et al v. The Quizno's Franchise Company, et al
as 09-500
Petitioner:
RAYMOND BONANNO, ANTHONY BONANNO, ROBERT PETER and others
Respondent:
THE QUIZNO'S FRANCHISE COMPANY, LLC, QUIZNO'S FRANCHISING, LLC, QUIZNO'S FRANCHISING II, LLC and others
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Saffron Express, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00233
Plaintiff:
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
Defendant:
Saffron Express, Inc. and Joginder Singh Malhi
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
v. Travelers Property Casualty Company of America et al
as 2:2009at00121
Defendant:
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America, Saffron Express, Inc. and Joginder Singh Malhi dba R&J Transport
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Saffron Express, Inc. et al
as 2:2009at00122
Plaintiff:
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
Defendant:
Saffron Express, Inc. and Joginder Singh Malhi dba R&J Transport
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
