Cases 1 - 10 of 191
Malone v. Dix
as 3:2024cv00059
Petitioner:
William Malone, Jr.
Respondent:
Sheriff Darrell Dix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Malone v. Spalding County
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
William Malone, Jr.
Defendant:
Spalding County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BULLOCK v. SHAVER et al
as 1:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY BULLOCK
Defendant:
WARDEN BRIAN SHAVER, DEPUTY WARDEN DELVIN PEOPLES, UNIT MANAGER NATALIE MALONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hines v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
Julius A Hines
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Warden Fox, Warden Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MALONE v. WYNN
as 5:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
ARTAVIOUS BERNARD MALONE
Defendant:
SELENA WYNN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grimes v. Noe et al
as 5:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Tony Eugene Grimes
Defendant:
Guy Noe, Mitchell, N Estelle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Collins v. Mitchel et al
as 4:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Derrick Dewayne Collins
Defendant:
Mitchel, Fox, Gary Malone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Gates, Jr. v. Lee County, et al
as 23-10353
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM A. GATES, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
LEE COUNTY, LEE COUNTY COURTHOUSE, LEE COUNTY JAIL and others
Eckerd v. Lush et al
as 2:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Andrew William Eckerd
Defendant:
Nigel Lush, Keith Higgins, Glynn County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLOYD v. MALONE, et al.
as 1:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
EDDIE FRANK FLOYD, III
Defendant:
MS MALONE, OFC THOMPSON, Anthony and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
