Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Malone v. Dix
as 3:2024cv00059
Petitioner:
William Malone, Jr.
Respondent:
Sheriff Darrell Dix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Malone v. Spalding County
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
William Malone, Jr.
Defendant:
Spalding County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05894
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Malone v. Northpointe Bank
as 1:2023cv04656
Plaintiff:
Audrey Malone
Defendant:
Northpointe Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00351
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Floyd v. Malone et al
as 2:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Eddie Frank Floyd, III
Defendant:
Mrs. Malone, Officer Thompson, Mrs. Anthony and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02093
Plaintiff:
Amy Malone
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Womens Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Malone v. Jackson et al
as 1:2022cv00913
Plaintiff:
Danny Dwayne Malone
Defendant:
Sergeant Kenyon Jackson, Marietta Police Department and City of Marietta, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv00555
Plaintiff:
Marcus E. Malone
Defendant:
Aaron C. Johnson, Officer John Doe #1, Officer John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
