Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Myers v. Maniilaq Association
as 5:2017cv00001
Plaintiff:
Thomas Myers
Defendant:
Maniilaq Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2016cv01292
Plaintiff:
Hudson Insurance Company and Maniilaq Association
Defendant:
Maniilaq Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Hudson Insurance Company v. Maniilaq Services, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv01293
Plaintiff:
Hudson Insurance Company
Defendant:
Maniilaq Services, LLC and Maniilaq Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MANIILAQ ASSOCIATION v. BURWELL et al
as 1:2015cv00152
Plaintiff:
MANIILAQ ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
SYLVIA BURWELL and YVETTE ROUBIDEAUX
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Sheldon et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2013cv00222
Plaintiff:
William S. Sheldon and George A. Sheldon, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Health & Human Services, Indian Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Derbyshire v. Sebelius et al
as 3:2013cv00214
Plaintiff:
Ella Ruth Derbyshire
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius, William J. Streur and Maniilaq Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
MANIILAQ ASSOCIATION v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2013cv00426
Plaintiff:
MANIILAQ ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS and YVETTE ROUBIDEAUX
Cause Of Action: 41 U.S.C. § 251 Public Contracts-Review of Agency Action
MANIILAQ ASSOCIATION v. SEBELIUS et al
as 1:2013cv00380
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS , YVETTE ROUBIDEAUX and CHRISTOPHER MANDREGAN, JR.
Plaintiff:
MANIILAQ ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
