Cases 1 - 10 of 12
RODRIGUEZ v. VIERA et al
as 5:2019cv03969
Plaintiff:
MANUEL RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
YOLERSY GONZALEZ and ERIKA VIERA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RODRIGUEZ v. SALUS et al
as 2:2014cv06637
Plaintiff:
VICTOR MANUEL RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
SAMUEL SALUS, JOSEPH P. MASCARO, MARY FITIPALDI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON et al
as 5:2014cv02405
Plaintiff:
MANUEL RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON, WARDEN, TORRES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00972
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
RODRIGUEZ v. LONGLEY
as 1:2011cv00213
Petitioner:
JESUS MANUEL RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
ARCHIE B. LONGLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RODRIGUEZ v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL
as 2:2011cv45405
Plaintiff:
MANUEL RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
RODRIGUEZ v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv77298
Plaintiff:
MANUEL RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RODRIGUEZ v. BARONE et al
as 2:2009cv00270
Petitioner:
VICTOR MANUEL RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MICHEAL BARONE, . THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
RODRIGUEZ-HERNANDEZ v. TENNIS et al
as 2:2007cv04113
Petitioner:
MANUEL RODRIGUEZ-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
FRANKLIN J. TENNIS and PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez-Hernandez v. Tennis et al
as 3:2007cv01702
Petitioner:
Manuel Rodriguez-Hernandez
Respondent:
Franklin J. Tennis and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
