Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Dudley v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
Robert Steven Dudley
Defendant:
Adam Gonzales, Diana Gonzales, Stephanie Porras and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez-Ramirez v. USA
as 3:2023cv01126
Petitioner:
Jose Manuel Ramirez-Ramirez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Torres Rivera v. Culebra Meat Market, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00487
Plaintiff:
Maria Rosalba Torres Rivera
Defendant:
Culebra Meat Market, Inc. and Manuel Ramirez Rivera
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ramirez et al v. City of Beaumont et al
as 1:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
Maria Isabel Ramirez, Amisadai Perez Castellanos, Manuel Ramirez, Sr. and others
Defendant:
City of Beaumont and RCI Hospitality Holdings Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
USA v. Ramirez-Ramirez
as 22-10035
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Manuel Ramirez-Ramirez
Duke v. Barraza
as 3:2021cv00159
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Duke
Defendant:
Jesus Manuel Ramirez Barraza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Great West Casualty Company v. Ramirez et al
as 4:2021cv02088
Plaintiff:
GREAT WEST CASUALTY COMPANY, AS SUBROGEE OF BOBBY LEHMANN, INC. and Great West Casualty Company
Defendant:
MANUEL RAMIREZ, SECOND GENERATION ARC N SPARK WELDING, LLC and Second Generation ARC N Spark Welding LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Juan Ramirez-Pacheco
as 20-50615
Defendant / Appellant:
Juan Manuel Ramirez-Pacheco
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Flores v. Ramirez et al
as 3:2019cv02249
Defendant:
Victor Manuel Ramirez and Mondelez International Inc
Plaintiff:
Katrina Flores and Karina Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramirez v. United States of America
as 7:2019cv00015
Petitioner:
Jesus Manuel Ramirez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
