Cases 1 - 10 of 21
MOLINA v. SEMPER LASER HOLDINGS LLC,
as 1:2026cv25977
Plaintiff:
MARCOS MOLINA
Defendant:
SEMPER LASER HOLDINGS LLC,
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv08537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MOLINA v. YOUNG LA TRADING CO, LLC
as 1:2026cv25476
Plaintiff:
MARCOS MOLINA
Defendant:
YOUNG LA TRADING CO, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
MOLINA v. GREAT WOLF LODGE
as 1:2026cv25475
Plaintiff:
MARCOS MOLINA
Defendant:
GREAT WOLF RESORTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Molina v. Pacific Sunwear of California, LLC
as 1:2026cv25066
Plaintiff:
MARCOS MOLINA
Defendant:
Pacific Sunwear of California, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Bahrami et al v. City of Antioch et al
as 3:2026cv06281
Plaintiff:
Abdul Bahrami, Halima Bahrami, Diana Bahrami and others
Defendant:
CIty of Antioch, Jake Merrill, Alejandro Lorono and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MOLINA v. MSC Cruises USA LLC
as 1:2026cv23925
Plaintiff:
MARCOS MOLINA
Defendant:
MSC Cruises USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
MOLINA v. Crunch Holdings, LLC
as 1:2026cv23922
Plaintiff:
MARCOS MOLINA
Defendant:
Crunch Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
MOLINA v. Guitar Center Stores, Inc.
as 1:2026cv23924
Plaintiff:
MARCOS MOLINA
Defendant:
Guitar Center Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
MOLINA v. HELLBENT LLC
as 1:2026cv22886
Plaintiff:
MARCOS MOLINA
Defendant:
HELLBENT LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.