Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
S.E.B.M. v. United States
as 24-2008
Plaintiff:
S.E.B.M., a minor, by and through her next friend, Maria Mendez Felipe
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Maria Mendez v. Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company et al
as 2:2022cv07073
Plaintiff:
Maria Mendez
Defendant:
Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
MENDEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv17612
Plaintiff:
MARIA MENDEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Maria Mendez Whitaker v. Pharmavite LLC
as 2:2022cv04732
Plaintiff:
Maria Mendez Whitaker
Defendant:
Pharmavite LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022at00443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
M&M Sisters, LLC, et al v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
as 22-11290
Plaintiff / Appellant:
M&M SISTERS, LLC, BERTHA MENENDEZ GARCIA and MARIA MENDEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
M&M Sisters, LLC et al v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
as 1:2021cv24081
Plaintiff:
M&M Sisters, LLC, Bertha Menendez Garcia and Maria Mendez
Defendant:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
