Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Mata et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 1:2018cv00352
Plaintiff:
Lily C. Mata and Mario A. Mata
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Foreclosure
Mata et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
as 1:2017cv01094
Plaintiff:
Lily C. Mata and Mario A. Mata
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Wells Fargo Bank, Natl Assn v. Mario Mata, et al
as 16-51343
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for SABR Trust 2004-OPI, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2004-OPI
Defendant - Appellant:
MARIO A. MATA and LILY C. MATA
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association v. Mata et al
as 1:2014cv00909
Defendant:
Lily C. Mata and Mario A. Mata
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
SPITZNAGEL v. MATA
as 3:2014cv03336
Plaintiff:
JOHN T. SPITZNAGEL
Defendant:
MARIO A. MATA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jose Velazquez Mata v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-60273
Petitioner:
JOSE MARIO VELAZQUEZ MATA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Mario Mata-Castro
as 13-10238
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARIO HONORIO MATA-CASTRO, AKA Honorio Castro-Mata, AKA Vicente Guerro, AKA Mario Mata-Martinez
USA v. Mario Mata-Castro
as 13-10221
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARIO HONORIO MATA-CASTRO
Mario Mata-Chavarria v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-60412
Petitioner:
MARIO ANDRES MATA-CHAVARRIA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Mendoza-Mata v. Six Unknown Names Agents
as 5:2009cv00451
Plaintiff:
Mario Mendoza-Mata
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
