Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Dwayne Gray v. Gary Miller
as 24-1504
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE E. GRAY
Defendant:
GARY MILLER, Judge, Marion County Superior Court
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
HAIRSTON v. MARION COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT #32 -- CLERK(S) OF THE MARION CIRCUIT COURT et al
as 1:2022cv00391
Plaintiff:
JOHN MANUEL HAIRSTON
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT #32 -- CLERK(S) OF THE MARION CIRCUIT COURT, INDIANA SUPREME COURT, DOXPOP, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JENNINGS v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
as 1:2016cv00004
Defendant:
ASHTON B. CARTER, CITY OF INDIANAPOILS, ET AL, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS and others
Plaintiff:
LAURA A. JENNINGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
ZAVODNIK et al v. CARROLL et al
as 1:2014cv00995
Defendant:
THOMAS J. CARROLL, ADAM C. COBB, KEVIN DEMPSEY and others
Plaintiff:
GERSH ZAVODNIK and TATIANA ZAVODNIK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MACKALL et al v. MOBERLY et al
as 1:2013cv00431
Defendant:
BMO HARRIS BANK N.A., RONALD W. BUCHMEIER, CATHEDRAL TRUSTEES INC. and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE K MACKALL and TIMOTHY W MACKALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MARION COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT et al v. IBN-MIKAEL-EL
as 1:2009cv00328
Plaintiff:
MARION COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, WILLIAM YOUNG, GEORGE MARTIN and others
Defendant:
KAREEM IBN-MIKAEL-EL
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TAYLOR et al v. NATIONAL CITY BANK et al
as 1:2007cv01148
Plaintiff:
ERIC TAYLOR and GAIL TAYLOR
Defendant:
NATIONAL CITY BANK, SAMUEL L. JACOBS, WILLIAM W. HURST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
