Cases 51 - 60 of 313
Michael Piskanin, Jr. v. John Wetzel, et al
as 13-4528
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH CAMERON, MARIROSA LAMAS and SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Toby v. Lamas et al
as 3:2013cv02882
Petitioner:
Dennis Toby
Respondent:
Marirosa Lamas and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Zilich v. Doll et al
as 3:2013cv02814
Plaintiff:
Wayne Zilich
Defendant:
Doll, Symons, Ted Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCDONALD v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv06710
Petitioner:
MAURICE MCDONALD
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, MARIROSA LAMAS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF LINDA KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MUHAMMAD v. LAMAS et al
as 1:2013cv00337
Petitioner:
BUWLUS A. MUHAMMAD
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS and REBECCA R. HAYWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
David Moore, Jr., et al v. Attorney General Pennsylvania
as 13-4354
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID L. MOORE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and MARIROSA LAMAS
WRIGHT v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2013cv06420
Petitioner:
JAMAL WRIGHT
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SIERRA v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2013cv06264
Petitioner:
JESUS SIERRA
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS, SUPERINTENDENT SCI-BENNER and ATTORNEY GENERAL COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hankins v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2013cv02565
Plaintiff:
Robert Hankins
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Jerome Walsh, Vincent Mooney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARDY v. LAMAS et al
as 1:2013cv02539
Petitioner:
KENNETH M. HARDY, JR.
Respondent:
Marirosa Lamas and KATHLEEN KAIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
