Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Mark Brown v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI, et al
as 23-1044
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARK A. BROWN
Defendant / Appellee: SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
GOLDBERG et al v. BROWN et al
as 2:2022cv01067
Plaintiff: DAVID GOLDBERG and DMG PUBLISHING LLC
Defendant: MARK E. BROWN, LEAP INDUSTRIES, DEVEION TOUSSANT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Mark Brown v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI, et al
as 21-2132
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARK A. BROWN
Defendant / Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Brown v. Saul
as 1:2020cv01726
Plaintiff: Mark Anthony Brown
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Brown v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv01820
Plaintiff: Mark Wade Brown
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Brown v. Link et al
as 3:2016cv00354
Petitioner: Mark D. Brown
Respondent: Cynthia R. Link, PA Attorney General Office, PA Board of Probation & Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mark Brown We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-1484
Petitioner: In re: MARK ANTHONY BROWN
Respondent: DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
BROWN v. KERESTES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv03068
Petitioner: MARK A. BROWN
Respondent: JOHN KERESTES, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. SHANNON et al
as 2:2008cv01643
Petitioner: MARK ANTHONY BROWN
Respondent: ROBERT SHANNON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?