Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Ronnie Cislo v. Mark Levenhagen
as 20-2751
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK E. LEVENHAGEN, Superintendent
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONNIE B. CISLO
Jerome Robertson v. Jennifer Harmon-Nary, et al
as 19-3059
Defendant / Appellee:
JENNIFER HARMON-NARY, Doctor, MARK E. LEVENHAGEN, Superintendent and ANITA K. WILLIAMS, Therapist
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEROME D. ROBERTSON
Leonard Thomas v. Geo Group, Inc., et al
as 19-1560
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEONARD THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK E. LEVENHAGEN, Superintendent, CARA MISTETIC, VICKI E. BURDINE and others
Michael Maxie v. Edward Bruemmer, et al
as 16-2926
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL A. MAXIE
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD BRUEMMER, Caseworker/Counselor, MICHAEL SCOTT, Assistant Superintendent, MARK E. LEVENHAGEN, Superintendent and others
Lakesha Norington v. Mark Levenhagen, et al
as 14-2849
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAKESHA NORINGTON, also known as SHAWNTRELL MARCEL NORINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK E. LEVENHAGEN, Superintendent, DENNIS GULLESON, Property Officer, MICHAEL R. PENCE, State Governor and others
Timothy Stevens v. Mark Levenhagen, et al
as 14-2483
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY A. STEVENS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK E. LEVENHAGEN, Superintendent, ALDEN KNOWLES, SERGEANT WHEELE and others
Lakesha Norington v. Mark Levenhagen
as 14-2433
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAKESHA NORINGTON
Respondent - Appellee:
MARK E. LEVENHAGEN, Superintendent
Lakesha Norington v. Mark Levenhagen
as 14-2377
Petitioner:
LAKESHA NORINGTON
Respondent:
MARK E. LEVENHAGEN, Superintendent
Jay Vermillion v. Mark Levenhagen, et al
as 14-2327
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAY F. VERMILLION
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK E. LEVENHAGEN, Superintendent, SALLY NOWATZKE, Case Counselor WCU, HOWARD MORTON, Administrative Assistant ISP and others
Demerries Dunson v. Mark Levenhagen
as 14-2259
Petitioner - Appellant:
DEMERRIES DUNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
MARK E. LEVENHAGEN, Superintendent
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
