Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Mitchell v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission
as 1:2014cv03924
Defendant:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Plaintiff:
Mark Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
GE Business Financial Services Inc. v. Davis et al
as 1:2012cv00988
Plaintiff:
GE Business Financial Services Inc.
Defendant:
Mark E. Davis, Mark Mitchell Davis , Martin E. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
LEE v. MITCHELL et al
as 1:2009cv00378
Plaintiff:
JON MICHAEL LEE
Defendant:
MARK MITCHELL, TEENA HATFIELD and TODD WHITLOCK
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
KENDRICK v. MITCHELL et al
as 1:2008cv01658
Plaintiff:
DAVID A. KENDRICK
Defendant:
MARK MITCHELL, TEENA HATFIELD, TODD WHITLOCK and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BROWN v. MAINTENANCE- DENIS WOODRUFF et al
as 1:2008cv01564
Plaintiff:
COREY NATHANIEL BROWN
Defendant:
MAINTENANCE- DENIS WOODRUFF, SHERIFF- MARK MITCHELL, JAIL COMMANDER- TINA HATFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SMITH v. MITCHELL et al
as 1:2008cv01116
Plaintiff:
AVERY SMITH
Defendant:
MARK MITCHELL, KATHY SMITH, BEN FLORA and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ROE v. MITCHELL et al
as 1:2008cv00167
Plaintiff:
JESSE JOE ROE
Defendant:
MARK MITCHELL, TEENA HATFIELD and MATTHEW JASON FORSYTHE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KENDRICK v. MITCHELL et al
as 1:2008cv00152
Plaintiff:
DAVID A. KENDRICK
Defendant:
MARK MITCHELL, TEENA HATFIELD and JASON FORSYTHE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ELI v. MITCHELL et al
as 1:2008cv00066
Plaintiff:
JAY COHEE ELI
Defendant:
MARK MITCHELL, TEENA HATFIELD and JASON FORSYTHE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GIDEON v. MITCHELL et al
as 1:2008cv00023
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. GIDEON
Defendant:
MARK MITCHELL, TEENA HATFIELD and JASON FORSYTHE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
