Cases 11 - 20 of 27
SMITH v. MITCHELL et al
as 1:2008cv01116
Plaintiff:
AVERY SMITH
Defendant:
MARK MITCHELL, KATHY SMITH, BEN FLORA and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ROE v. MITCHELL et al
as 1:2008cv00167
Plaintiff:
JESSE JOE ROE
Defendant:
MARK MITCHELL, TEENA HATFIELD and MATTHEW JASON FORSYTHE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KENDRICK v. MITCHELL et al
as 1:2008cv00152
Plaintiff:
DAVID A. KENDRICK
Defendant:
MARK MITCHELL, TEENA HATFIELD and JASON FORSYTHE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ELI v. MITCHELL et al
as 1:2008cv00066
Plaintiff:
JAY COHEE ELI
Defendant:
MARK MITCHELL, TEENA HATFIELD and JASON FORSYTHE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GIDEON v. MITCHELL et al
as 1:2008cv00023
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. GIDEON
Defendant:
MARK MITCHELL, TEENA HATFIELD and JASON FORSYTHE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MULLIN V. MITCHELL, ET AL
as 1:2007cv01582
Plaintiff:
KEVIN P. MULLIN
Defendant:
MARK MITCHELL, CLINTON CO. JAIL COMMD: TINA HATFIELD, CLINTON CO. ASST JAIL COMMD: M.J. FORSYTHE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MULLIN v. MITCHELL et al
as 1:2007cv01569
Plaintiff:
KEVIN P. MULLIN
Defendant:
MARK MITCHELL, M.J. FORSYTHE and TINA HATFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIDSON v. MITCHELL et al
as 1:2007cv01407
Plaintiff:
SHAWN A. DAVIDSON
Defendant:
MARK MITCHELL, TEENA HATFIELD and JASON FORSYTHE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HESS v. MITCHELL et al
as 1:2007cv01387
Plaintiff:
JACOB L. HESS
Defendant:
MARK MITCHELL, TEENA HATFIELD and JASON FORSYTHE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. MITCHELL et al
as 1:2007cv01315
Plaintiff:
MARTIN LEE BROWN
Defendant:
MARK MITCHELL, TEENA HATFIELD and JASON FORSYTHE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
